The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Confirm implementation context
|
|
Project drivers, triggers, risks, risk management contexts, treatment options, priorities and practical constraints are clarified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Applicable policies and procedures are identified |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Key stakeholders are identified along with their potential interests, sensitivities, roles and responsibilities |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop implementation plan
|
|
Risks to be treated and current treatment options are confirmed, in accordance with organisational policies and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Treatment actions, resources required, milestones, budget, reporting procedures and roles and responsibilities of project team members are identified |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implementation issues are identified and contingencies are developed, as required, in accordance with organisational policies |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
An agreed treatment plan is documented and submitted for approval, in accordance with organisational policies and procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communicate the treatment plan
|
|
Processes to effectively consult and communicate are selected for implementation Completed |
Evidence:
|
Consultation plan is developed and implemented, in accordance with organisational procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Facilitate treatment plan implementation
|
|
Treatment tasks and activities are allocated, in accordance with the implementation plan Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communication between working group members is maintained |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholders are kept informed of progress, performance and any proposed variations in strategy or implementation |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Agreed treatment plan variations are planned, assessed and presented to accommodate changed circumstances or to achieve more effective outcomes |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor and review treatment plan implementation
|
|
A review process is established, in accordance with organisational policies and in consultation with stakeholders Completed |
Evidence:
|
Effectiveness of treatment activities, adequacy of resources, project progress and expenditure are monitored against plans and are recorded and reported |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implementation plans are adjusted, as required, following the review process |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Adjustments to implementation plans are communicated to stakeholders, in accordance with treatment plan |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Residual risk is re-evaluated after treatment to determine whether to accept the risk or reassess the risk, in accordance with the treatment plan |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|